Robert Ringer

In the Spotlight: The Root of All Evil

By Robert Ringer - Wednesday, May 29, 2013

The newest Obama scandal, the IRS’ targeting of conservative groups, has been in the news a lot lately.  Like Benghazi, Fast and Furious, ACORN, members of the New Black Panther Party not being prosecuted for threatening voters with nightsticks, and the refusal to give nary an encouraging word to anti-government protestors in Iran, it’s unlikely to result in tarnishing Barack Obama’s reputation, let alone leading to his impeachment or indictment.

Even so, to the roughly half of the population that actually thinks about serious matters now and then, it’s a reminder of the truth in the title of Frank Chodorov’s classic, The Income Tax: Root of all Evil.  The income tax (federal and state) is the root of all evil because without the power to take people’s incomes by force, government would be impotent, which is precisely what the Founders wanted.  They were well aware that government itself is inherently evil, and thus, by its very nature, attracted to evil ideas and schemes.

The evilness of the progressive income tax is that it is based on envy.  Ever since the passage of the 16th Amendment in 1913, people have been taught to believe that the income tax is a surefire way to “soak the rich” and ease the tax burden on the poor and middle class.  From the outset, of course, scheming politicians were well aware that even a 100 percent tax on the so-called rich would only run the government for a matter of days.  Yet, even today, they pretend as though they are not aware of this fact.

And, of course, the progressive income tax does not reduce the burden on those hapless, envious souls in the lower brackets.  What it does do, however, is make it more difficult for them to find and keep good jobs, because it removes the incentive for the wealthy to invest in new ventures and expand existing businesses.  What’s the point in investing more capital if you know, in advance, you will be punished if you succeed?

Pseudo-conservatives in Congress love to rant about reducing taxes, but they know full well that taxes are not the problem.  The real problem is spending.  The only way to reduce taxes is to reduce the size and scope of government, which brings us to the crux of the issue:  Any talk of reducing the size and scope of government immediately brings about accusations of lacking compassion for those who are “in need.”

There are virtually no conservative politicians who have the stones to stand up to such accusations, which results in their support of tyranny.  Politicians are convinced that they cannot stay in office if they do not support wealth redistribution.  Oh, sure, they argue about redistribution-of-wealth policies, but their arguments always center around the extent and growth rate of such policies, not their elimination.

Now that the IRS is in the headlines, perhaps it’s a good time to examine the litmus-test question of progressivism more closely:  What would happen to the sick, the elderly, and the destitute in a free society?  Personally, I don’t believe it’s even the right question.  The question conservatives should be asking is whether redistribution of wealth really does better the existence of those who are unable to care for themselves.  Henry Grady Weaver answered this question succinctly in The Mainspring of Human Progress when he said:

Most of the major ills of the world have been caused by well-meaning people who ignored the principle of individual freedom, except as applied to themselves, and who were obsessed with fanatical zeal to improve the lot of mankind-in-the-mass through some pet formula of their own. … The harm done by ordinary criminals, murderers, gangsters, and thieves is negligible in comparison with the agony inflicted upon human beings by the professional “do-gooders,” who attempt to set themselves up as gods on earth and who would ruthlessly force their views on all others — with the abiding assurance that the end justifies the means.

Translation:  Government solutions to “end poverty” make things far worse, not better, for those they are supposedly intended to help.

There is no question in my mind that Marx and Engels, the sociopaths who started it all, truly believed that their ends would justify their means.  Ditto with Lenin and Trotsky, who put the ideas of Marx and Engels into practice via the Bolshevik Revolution.

But the paradises left-wing revolutionaries envisioned never materialized, and now their countries have trashed communism and moved in the direction of individualism and free enterprise.  Over and over again, the message is clear:  Taking from rich Peter to pay poor Paul does not work!

However, it’s not necessary to study failed communist regimes to witness this truism at play.  It’s evident in the U.S. by the way people are voting with their feet by fleeing high-tax states like California, New York, and Illinois for tax-free states such as Florida, Nevada, and Texas.

While the efforts of such people are noble, let us not forget just how evil governments can be.  There is a strong possibility that the federal government will bail out all bankrupt states — which would mean that, indirectly, people who fled high-tax states for no-tax states would still end up paying taxes in the states they escaped.

Sound farfetched?  I’m told that people in the early 1900s thought the same thing when those ahead of the curve expressed concern that Congress might ultimately gain the power to tax incomes.  They pointed out that the Founding Fathers went to the trouble to prohibit direct taxation in Article I, Section 9, Clause 4 of the Constitution.  Additionally, they argued, an income tax would violate the 4th Amendment, which requires that a citizen’s privacy be protected.

Everything, including the Constitution, sounds good on paper, but, as I said, the inherent evilness of government is like a magnet for evil ideas and evil schemes.  Which is why today the root of all evil — taxation — is like an insatiable tapeworm for which there is no cure.

You have permission to reprint this article so long as you place the following wording at the end of the article:

Copyright © 2019 Robert Ringer
ROBERT RINGER is a New York Times #1 bestselling author and host of the highly acclaimed Liberty Education Interview Series, which features interviews with top political, economic, and social leaders. He has appeared on Fox News, Fox Business, The Tonight Show, Today, The Dennis Miller Show, Good Morning America, The Lars Larson Show, ABC Nightline, and The Charlie Rose Show, and has been the subject of feature articles in such major publications as Time, People, The Wall Street Journal, Fortune, Barron's, and The New York Times.

Respond to Writer

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints. Make your case passionately, but please keep your comments civil and to the point (maximum of 1500 characters). Obscene, profane, abusive, or off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion. Thanks for your participation.

10 Responses to “In the Spotlight: The Root of All Evil”

  1. texas wolfie says:

    Let's face facts Mr. Ringer. Some people just can't compete. Whether it's from laziness, bad environment, physical limitations or whatever it has always has been that way and always will be that way. Jesus said "the poor will be with you always". The question is how much should the government play in "helping" people? I say none and leave it to private charities.

    • texas wolfie says:

      Let's suppose I have a neighbor who needs help. I take the neighbor to a store and buy him/her $400 worth of groceries for a month for them and their kids. Total cost? 400.00 Let's now suppose she/he goes to the government for food cards. A friend of mine who works as a number cruncher for a company I won't name says that those same groceries at government level, cost the taxpayer $1200. Case closed.

  2. Alfredo says:

    We can support the Fair Tax; at least that would eliminate the IRS.

  3. Lawrence Ekdahl, says:

    Isn't it obvious that the so called war on poverty has done nothing more than create more poverty. We now have close to 150,000,000 people on the government dole with no chance to improve themselves nor improve their children

    • NoSpin says:

      A war on replication might be more effective at reducing suffering and the numbers of the poor rather than endless expensive and futile politics.
      The Chinese got it right to reduce numbers, but not by their barbaric methods. But I suppose it could be argued that the sufferings involved in the death of a brand new uncomprehending infant are far less than the lifelong cumulative sufferings and the eventual death through stroke or cancer or heart of an mentally aware and excruciatingly lonely eighty year old.
      Stop euthanasia by practicing abstinence or stop hypocritically saying you love your children knowing, as they don't, what they face, ie subjecting them to that which you as the parents solely responsible for their existence, fear and loath and have practically no hope of escaping, yourselves. Jesus' use of the word poor did not mean financially poor, He meant and defined poor as those who do not exercise faith to possess Him [as all can]. We are rich when we possess Him as the pearl of great price, though we be financially poor. Too few know the reality of Christ, preferring instead the reality of the world which leads to endless suffering as generation piles on generation like a gigantic social sexual train wreck which started at the beginning, in the Garden of Eden falling into endless sin and death. Kind regards…

  4. karl296 says:

    Ahhh. But the government WANTS as many people dependent upon it as possible. It is for that very reason that the so-called "war on crime", "war on drugs", "war on poverty", and "war on terror" have ALL been dismal failures! Every one of these bogus "wars" require ever increasing government employment, funding, intrusion, and power. Now that "safety" is more important than freedom, the government can justify its control of everybody, everywhere, everytime, forever just to keep us all "safe". The more dependent we are on the government (why do you think its busy exporting our jobs overseas?) the more power they have over us. and that's the name of the game – "power"!

  5. Pitch says:

    There is the moral of all human tales:
    ‘Tis but the same rehearsal of the past;
    First Freedom and then Glory—when that fails,
    Wealth, vice, corruption—BARBARISM AT LAST!
    If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face–forever.
    Welcome to Amerika.
    The sun'll come out tomorrow,
    Bet your bottom dollar,
    That tomorrow there will be SUN!!!!

  6. Wisdom says:

    Hitler thought the ends justified the means. Are you suggesting he was evil? lol

  7. Stazve says:

    "it’s unlikely to result in tarnishing Barack Obama’s reputation" Ringer says. Today at a Rite-Aid I bought the new "Globe" (the gossip rag) because Obama was on the cover with an "impeach Obama" headline. I was heartened that a trashy tabloid that the uneducated read had such a story on its cover. It means that EVERYONE is interested in and get informed about Obama's corruption; the uneducated as well as those who read the opinion page of the WSJ. Which means Obama is indeed getting tarnished.

  8. どうしたの 友人、良い 段落をと実際にはこれらによって楽しん} In the Spotlight: The Root of All Evil 、私は促すはここで{コメントした。
    フェラガモ 靴

Leave a Reply

To Receive Free Daily
Articles Via E-mail
Click Here

Featured Columnists

The Problem:
A Government-Created Depression
The Solution: Set the Entrepreneur Free to Create Wealth!

Click here to learn about Robert Ringer's landmark new book, The Entrepreneur:
The Way Back for the U.S. Economy
, that is shocking the establishment.

Liberty Education
Interview Series

Robert Ringer interviews top political, economic, and social leaders on today's most vital and controversial issues.

Dr. Benjamin Carson Interview

Featured Interview:
Dr. Benjamin Carson

Audio file loading...

More Interviews