Judge Andrew Napolitano

Why We Should Mistrust the Government

By Judge Andrew Napolitano - Thursday, May 9, 2013

It should come as no surprise that President Obama told Ohio State students at graduation ceremonies last week that they should not question authority and they should reject the calls of those who do. He argued that “our brave, creative, unique experiment in self-rule” has been so successful that trusting the government is the same as trusting ourselves; hence, challenging the government is the same as challenging ourselves. And he blasted those who incessantly warn of government tyranny.

Yet, mistrust of government is as old as America itself. America was born out of mistrust of government. The revolution that was fought in the 1770s and 1780s was actually won in the minds of colonists in the mid-1760s when the British imposed the Stamp Act and used writs of assistance to enforce it. The Stamp Act required all persons in the colonies to have government-sold stamps on all documents in their possession, and writs of assistance permitted search warrants written by British troops in which they authorized themselves to enter private homes ostensibly to look for the stamps.

These two pieces of legislation were so unpopular here that Parliament actually rescinded the Stamp Act, and the king’s ministers reduced the use of soldier-written search warrants. But the searches for the stamps turned the tide of colonial opinion irreversibly against the king.

The same king also prosecuted his political adversaries in Great Britain and here for what he called “seditious libel” — basically, criticizing the government. Often that criticism spread and led to civil disobedience, so the British sought to punish it at its source. The prosecutions were so unpopular here, and so contrary to the spirit of what would become the Declaration of Independence, that when the British went home and the Framers wrote the Constitution and the Bill of Rights was added, the First Amendment assured that the new government could not punish speech.

Yet barely 10 years into “our brave, creative, unique experiment in self-rule,” in the infamous Alien and Sedition Acts, Congress at the instigation of President John Adams criminalized free speech that was critical of the new government.

How did it come about that members of the same generation — in some cases the very same human beings — that declared in the First Amendment that “Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech” in fact enacted laws that did just that?

As morally wrong, as violative of the natural law, as unconstitutional as these laws were, they were not historical incongruities. Thomas Jefferson — who opposed and condemned the acts (he was Adams’ vice president at the time) — warned that it is the nature of government over time to increase and of liberty to decrease. And that’s why we should not trust government. In the same era, James Madison himself agreed when he wrote, “All men having power should be distrusted to a certain degree.”

The Alien and Sedition Acts were but the beginning of a long train of government abuses visited upon people in America as a consequence of the “experiment in self-rule.” I am not quoting Obama’s Ohio State speech to nitpick, but rather to establish a base line for my argument that he rejects core principles and historical lessons and, most troubling, the natural law itself when he opines that government should be trusted because it has gained power via self-rule.

Self-rule alone is hardly a basis for governmental legitimacy, unless it is accompanied by fidelity to the natural law and to the rule of law. The rule of law here means fidelity to the Constitution, that all laws are just and apply to everyone, so no one is excused from obeying the laws and no one is excluded from their protections. Yet, self-rule here has been unjust and has brought us the tyranny of the majority. And that tyranny has brought us slavery, unjust wars, Jim Crow laws, domestic concentration camps in wartime, slaughter of babies in the womb, domestic spying without search warrants, torture and death by drones — just to name a few.

The reason Obama likes government and the reason it is “a dangerous fire,” as George Washington warned, and the reason I have been warning against government tyranny in my public work is all the same: The government rejects the natural law because it is an obstacle to its control over us. The natural law is divinely embedded in our souls. It is manifested by the universal yearning for freedom and justice. It consists of areas of human behavior — thought, expression, religion, self-defense, travel, acquisition and use of property, privacy, for example — in which our behavior is subject only to the exercise of our free will and not the permission of our neighbors or regulation by the government. The natural law, properly understood, is a restraint on the government.

Yet, government in America — whether it consists of Congress protecting the slave trade, or John Adams or Abraham Lincoln or Woodrow Wilson prosecuting political speech, or FDR incarcerating Japanese-Americans, or George W. Bush promising immunity for torturers and domestic warrantless spies, or Obama killing whomever he chooses with drones — has never hesitated to reject the natural law. All of these violations of the natural law were approved by the majority when undertaken. The government’s persistent and systematic rejection of the natural law is alone sufficient to mistrust government and reject Obama’s Ohio State advice.

The government that has come about by self-rule derives its powers from the consent of the governed. Because the tyranny of the majority can be as dangerous to freedom as the tyranny of a madman, all use of governmental power should be challenged and questioned. Government is essentially the negation of liberty. If we fail to challenge government at every turn, there will be no liberty remaining for us to defend when the government tries to negate it.


Be the first to read Judge Andrew Napolitano's columns and other Voice of Sanity articles by signing up today and having them delivered directly into your inbox each morning.

Additional articles by Judge Andrew Napolitano

Respond to Writer

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints. Make your case passionately, but please keep your comments civil and to the point (maximum of 1500 characters). Obscene, profane, abusive, or off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion. Thanks for your participation.

9 Responses to “Why We Should Mistrust the Government”

  1. Lawrence Ekdahl, says:

    It all boils down to; hold there feet to the fire with the constitution and when necessary invoke the 9th and 10th amendments. Of course, this assumes that congress will obey their duty to do what is necessary. I wot not.

  2. U S Patriot says:

    Bravo, Judge! Well said!

  3. Teri says:

    I think both parties are village idiots.

    • Laurence Tribe says:

      Consider the alternative for a moment. Those occupying the seats of government didn't get there by being stupid and most become candidates supported by people with big bucks and a political agenda; so we, the people, end up with people in Congress who owe allegiance not to we, the people, but to those who put them in office. And many R's and D's have conspired to put us all in debt to the Federal Reserve corporation that is presently devaluing every dollar in your possession. My point being that there's an out-of-control venal group in Washington selling us out and a whole bunch of "village idiots" electing them do it.

  4. Daniel Joseph says:

    Sometimes trust relates to an expectation of an outcome.

    Many years ago I did a direct mailing and it took three weeks for a letter to get from Chicago to Topeka, Kansas. I told my partner that the Post Office didn’t work. He replied: “No Dan, the Post office works. That’s how it works. If you want a letter to get to Topeka, you need to mail it three weeks before you want it to get there.”

    Many people are constantly disappointed when the government screws thing up, is completely full of corruption, takes advantage of the weak while promising to protect the weak, etc. That’s how the government works. You can trust the government to continue to do these things. Still others claim we can make the government more efficient. Every politician has promised that but no one seems to deliver. You can trust that the next group of politicians will not be able to make the government more efficient either. Others people trust the government to continue to operate the way the government operates. They believe that less government is the solution.

    One of the whistleblowers that testified yesterday said: “We were under attack, and we were on our own.”

    And the sad part of that is that we are all “on our own” with regard to the government. We always have been. The government may promise to help us and may even do that for a while. But it only makes us more dependent.

  5. JMP says:

    Great article, but with one sour note: I'm sorry to see the judge repeat the myth about Washington making the statement about government being "a dangerous fire". Today, thanks to the Internet, you can access the complete collection of all writing and speeches of George Washington at the Library of Congress site and do your own searches and verify for yourself that there is no evidence that Washington ever made this statement in any speech, letter or publication.

  6. John Carman says:

    I have been in law enforcement for over 25 years, U.S. Secret Service, San Diego P.D., U.S.Mint Police, U.S. Customs & Immigration and had to become a "Whistle-blower cause the internal reporting systems do NOT work.
    There is NO protection for a law enforcement whistle-blower.
    I still need an attorney who is NOT Compromised and is willing to fight for Justice.
    The government was so incensed to go after me including Death Threats, that they got an "illegal Alien" informant who is a convicted Felon who was convicted in 1996 of setting up "other" Customs officials.
    The U.S. Attorney's are the worst !!
    This informant was lying to get a Green Card!(All for an alleged Conspiracy charge)
    My rights were violated from the beginning.
    I will cut it short here.
    I have no pension and the Government did NOT take out for Social Security.
    I have a web site: http://www.customscorruption.com
    My email: john.a.carman@gmail.com
    Cell: (619)609-1733

  7. retroAC says:

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Nazi Germany come about through self-rule.

  8. Leb says:

    I don't trust either politicial party. The people of America however get what they deserve since they never get involved. People are worried about themselves and not realizing they are slowly losing there rights!

Leave a Reply

To Receive Free Daily
Articles Via E-mail
Click Here

Featured Columnists

The Problem:
A Government-Created Depression
The Solution: Set the Entrepreneur Free to Create Wealth!

Click here to learn about Robert Ringer's landmark new book, The Entrepreneur:
The Way Back for the U.S. Economy
, that is shocking the establishment.

Liberty Education
Interview Series

Robert Ringer interviews top political, economic, and social leaders on today's most vital and controversial issues.

Dr. Benjamin Carson Interview

Featured Interview:
Dr. Benjamin Carson

Audio file loading...

More Interviews